The ability to bring a claim in tort, as nicely as contract, offers a number of added benefits. It is also clear, nonetheless, that parties could arrange their affairs to exclude liability in tort by like valid exclusion clauses in their contract. Whilst that case did not involve an action against auditors, equivalent concerns about indeterminate liability had been, nonetheless, clearly relevant. In Robinson v Jones, the claimant was a house owner who had entered into a contract with the contractor to obtain a house from him and to enter into an NHBC Agreement.
Reflecting upon the wording of a duty to take reasonable care”, it would seem unlikely, but offered the respective tests for remoteness it seems that the causes of action in contract and tort concurrent but distinct. The first relationship is a single in which the contract stipulates a a lot more stringent obligation than the basic law of tort would impose. Particularly, in contract the limitation period ordinarily begins to run upon breach, whereas in tort the limitation period does not run until the damage becomes identified (Feldthusen, pg 99). So a claimant could have fantastic cause to pursue a claim in tort as effectively as one particular in contract.
Whilst indeterminate liability would have raised some concern to the Lords had the plaintiff not been identified to the defendants or had the credit reference been utilised for a goal or transaction other than that for which it was essentially prepared, no such difficulties about indeterminacy arose on the particular details of the case. The legal evaluation of such misrepresentations depends on no matter if the misrepresentations had been made prior to, or soon after, the execution of the contract.
When considering the effect of the subsequent contract on the representee’s tort action, everything revolves around the nature of the contractual obligations assumed by the parties and the nature of the alleged negligent misrepresentation. It is rather that the tort duty, a general duty imputed by the law in all the relevant situations, have to yield to the parties’ superior proper to arrange their rights and duties in a distinct way. The third partnership is a single in which the duty in contract and the duty in tort are co-extensive.
This is illustrated by consideration of the 3 scenarios that may well arise when contract and tort are applied to the similar wrong. It can clearly be argued that the leaseholder’s interest was inside the reasonable contemplation of the parties when the contract was produced: it was specified. Contractors, consultants and their insurers will welcome this reassurance as to the level of loss recoverable in tort where there is a concurrent claim in contract. On the other hand, guarantee period in the contract had expired, so contractor not held accountable.